For most North Carolina workers the answer is no, by design. But the rule has edges, and the people who caused many workplace injuries are not the employer at all. Here is where a lawsuit is still possible.
The trade at the heart of workers’ compensation is simple. The employer pays defined benefits for every work injury without arguing about fault, and in return the employee gives up the right to sue the employer for negligence.
But the provision has conditions, and the workplace has more than two parties. An uninsured employer never made the trade. An employer that meant to hurt someone is outside it. And the driver who hit the company van, the manufacturer of the press that crushed a hand, and the other contractor whose crew dropped the load were never protected by it. Joshua E. Palmer, Attorney at Law represents injured workers across North Carolina, and this page explains when the lawsuit door is closed and when it is open.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-10.1 provides that if the employee and the employer are subject to and have complied with the Act, the rights and remedies it grants exclude all other rights and remedies of the employee, the employee’s dependents, and next of kin against the employer at common law or otherwise on account of the injury or death. That is the exclusive-remedy rule. It means a worker hurt by an employer’s negligence, even gross negligence, cannot bring a negligence suit; the compensation claim is the whole remedy, and it pays medical care and a portion of lost wages but not pain and suffering.
The rule also protects the employer’s insurer and co-workers acting in the course of employment, but it does not extend to anyone outside the employment relationship.
Two situations. First, the employer did not comply with the Act. The exclusive-remedy rule requires that the employer be subject to and have complied with the Act, and an employer that was required to carry coverage under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-93 and did not has not complied. An injured worker at an uninsured employer can still claim compensation from the Industrial Commission, which can also impose the penalties in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-94, and can additionally sue the employer for negligence in superior court for the full measure of damages. The catch is that a negligence suit may revive defenses the Act removed, including North Carolina’s contributory negligence rule.
Second, intentional conduct. North Carolina courts recognise a narrow exception for an employer’s intentional conduct that is substantially certain to cause serious injury or death, which is treated as outside the compensation bargain. It is a demanding standard, well beyond carelessness or even a known safety violation, and most attempts to use it fail. It is worth evaluating when an employer knowingly removed a guard or concealed a hazard, but it should never be assumed.
| Defendant | Lawsuit allowed? | Fault rules that apply |
|---|---|---|
| Employer that carries required coverage | No; workers’ comp is the exclusive remedy under § 97-10.1 | None; benefits are paid without regard to fault |
| Employer that failed to carry required coverage | Yes, in addition to a Commission claim | Negligence, with contributory negligence as a defense |
| Employer whose intentional conduct was substantially certain to injure | Yes, under a narrow court-recognised exception | Intentional-tort standard; rarely met |
| Third party: other driver, product maker, other contractor, property owner | Yes, under § 97-10.2, alongside the comp claim | Negligence, with contributory negligence as a defense; employer lien on the recovery |
| Co-worker or supervisor acting within employment | Generally no | Covered by the exclusive remedy |
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-10.2 preserves the injured worker’s right to sue any person other than the employer whose negligence caused the injury. The two claims run at the same time. Workers’ compensation pays medical care and wage benefits promptly and without regard to fault; the third-party suit seeks the damages compensation does not pay, including pain and suffering and full lost earnings. Because the employer or its insurer has paid benefits for an injury someone else caused, the statute gives it a lien on the third-party recovery, and the distribution of a settlement is worked out under the statute’s ordering rules, with the Industrial Commission or the court able to adjust the lien in some circumstances.
The third-party claim is where fault returns. Contributory negligence, the common-law rule codified in part by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-139 that bars recovery when the injured person’s own negligence contributed to the injury, is a full defense in the third-party suit even though it is no defense to the compensation claim. Our guide to the exceptions to contributory negligence explains when the defense does not apply.
Almost nothing. Benefits are paid without regard to whose negligence caused the accident, and the employee’s ordinary carelessness is no defense. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-12 carves out the exceptions: no compensation where the injury was proximately caused by the worker’s intoxication, by a controlled substance, or by a willful intention to injure or kill; a ten percent reduction where the injury was caused by the worker’s willful failure to use a safety appliance or follow a safety rule approved by the Commission; and a ten percent increase where it was caused by the employer’s willful failure to comply with a statutory requirement.
That is a ten percent adjustment, not a lawsuit. When the injury is serious and someone other than a compliant employer is responsible, the third-party claim is the path to full compensation, and our North Carolina workers’ compensation lawyer page explains how the firm runs both claims together.

Joshua E. Palmer
Managing Partner · Joshua E. Palmer, Attorney at Law
Attorney Palmer concentrates in personal injury law and trained in North Carolina law at North Carolina Central University School of Law in Durham. These answers are the ones he gives clients across a desk, written down: direct, in plain English, and tied to the North Carolina rule that applies.
Hurt at work and wondering whether anyone besides your employer is responsible? Call for a free case review and we will map every claim you have.
Responsible attorney: Joshua E. Palmer, Managing Partner · 106 Moran Dr #5106, Bonaire, GA 31005 · (478) 887-3734. Attorney advertising. This page is general legal information about North Carolina law, not legal advice for your situation; contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.
We run the workers’ comp claim and the third-party claim together so nothing is left on the table. Free consultation, no fee unless we win.
Each case is different. Any results, settlement figures, or benefit amounts described on this page depend on the specific facts of that case and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in yours. Statutes and benefit rates cited are current as of October 2026; confirm current law with an attorney before relying on it.